I know that many of the posts this month have been political. That was probably inevitable. But one thing that I wanted to write about was Clinton herself, because in the past few years I've felt a particular affinity for her, which is tied into some of my own journey.
I grew up in a very Republican household, and I don't really remember hearing much about Hillary, even during Bill's presidency. Not until the Monica Lewinsky scandal, and then afterwards...there was judgment towards Hillary--specifically for not leaving Bill. My mom (who doesn't consume media as critically as I'd hope) expressed several times that the only reason for her not to do so was her own ambition...it was interpreted as self-serving and a political calculation. Which then somehow seemed confirmed when she ran for office herself and became a NY Senator. I was pretty young at this point (still elementary school and then through middle school), and so I absorbed it uncritically. In high school, conservative politics became some sort of prerequisite for being a Christian, and it took my years at Gordon to unwend the two.
I started to become more liberal. I'm from NH, so there's still a strong independent streak in my blood...(I try to listen carefully, and there are some Republican politicians whom I admire. But honestly, it's their social policies that I just can't handle anymore on any level). I made peace with that around my last few years at Gordon, and by the time 2008 rolled around, I was on the Democrats train.
Here's the thing--I was on Obama's train from the beginning. I'd examined by personal political stances, but I never really went back and re-examined my thoughts about somebody like Hillary. I thought she was way too ambitious and corrupt, and everything that Obama was saying was exactly what I thought we needed. I thought bipartisanship was important and could help us get some real shit done. I believed in closing Guantanamo, and felt that he had a very hopeful and positive vision of the future. I liked that he was experienced, and I had no real clue of the real effects of the Clinton presidency, because while I had re-evaluated my current political positions, as I mentioned, I didn't go back and check past perceptions. The Lewinsky issue was all I could really have told you about either Clinton, really. (And to be honest, I actually liked McCain a decent amount back then, he was too hawkish, but then he went and unleashed Palin on us, and I will literally never forgive him [and whoever advised him to make that choice] for that as long as I live.)
But I remember, not as clearly as I want to, one of debates or comments that Clinton made around that time...and I wish I remember the specifics, but it was more of a general thing. Obama was talking about bipartisanship and the need to reach across the aisle, and at one point, Clinton sort of dismissed that as naïve. And I thought to myself at the time, "See that is everything that is wrong with you and why we need a candidate that is willing to work with others and get stuff done. You're an insider."
Obama became president, and I am still thankful for that. I honestly don't really regret voting for him in the primary, and I love that she ended up as his Secretary of State, and that they worked together for some solid years. But I remember, shortly after Obama became president that when he tried to invite Republicans to work with him (especially then Sen. Judd Gregg in NH, whom I respected and was excited)...and it just all fell to pieces. And I don't know all of the real reasoning behind that, but I saw Republicans dig their heels in and just move to counter Obama at every turn. (I'm not going to lie, I hated at the time, and I hope that I would've been frustrated with it if somebody like Romney had become president, but with Tr*mperdink I seriously hope that he is blocked from seriously damaging policies and bigoted things while in office. And I will deal with that hypocrisy.)
But I remember watching that unfold and somehow, a thought crept in--you know, I judged Clinton for that, but she was right. She was pragmatic--she wasn't saying the popular thing, the thing that inspired and moved people. She was saying the wise thing based on her experience. And if I remember, she got flack for it. In my mind, I gave her flack for it.
Fast forward to this time around, and that was a large part of why I was in Clinton's camp from the beginning. No disrespect to Bernie supporters--a large majority of my friends supported him, and frankly, I love him and Warren in the Senate. I think that's the better place for them, honestly. (Though I had wanted a Clinton-Warren ticket for at least 4 years now. That would've probably hurt even more than anything. I digress.) I saw the populism of Bernie, and I looked at his promises, and Clinton's more tempered discussion. And I remembered her with Obama as well, and I thought that she seemed the same pragmatic person.
I had also, in the last few years, watched some of the attacks that had happened on her character. I tried to be attentive to the Benghazi scandals, and just couldn't understand exactly why they were attacking her non-stop. I'm not saying that there weren't issues with decisions there, but people acted suddenly like she had somehow wanted people to die. I think there were moments of speaking too soon about the causes and perhaps some other decisions could have been made that would've been better in hindsight. But hindsight is 20/20...we don't hear about all the times decisions have worked, we hear about the times that they failed. Then the emails, and again, there was some concerns there, but I watched it be blown out of proportion to the evidence. And I started to realize how much more harshly she got judged on every single little thing. I do buy that some of that is related to her gender, I've seen that play out in how women in power (in business or politics) are judged. I think some of it is related to her personality, and some of it due to the expectation that everybody had to have had that she would be the 2016 nominee. I mean, there was some question of it earlier this year, but the GOP had the benefit of having way more time to sow seeds of doubt and smears on Hillary in some ways...Dems couldn't have dreamed in 2012 or 2014 that Tr*mperdink would be the nominee. I don't think so anyways.
(God this is so long, I'm sorry).
There wasn't a ton of enthusiasm in many corners for Hillary. I had a few close friends who were enthusiastic, but even among my fellow Democrats, there wasn't a ton of enthusiasm. Part of me gets that, but this time I was actually enthused. Most of it was for the reasons I discussed above--her pragmatism. The way that though she certainly used persuasion just like all politicians do, I think she was wise in the way she did it. When she ran negative ads against Tr*mperdink...they focused on his own words and temperament, things he couldn't deny (and yet he tried to anyways.) She had pragmatic policies, though I wish she had expounded them a little more during the debates, and even though at times she changes positions...I can respect that. She seems to do so after thoughtful consideration. In some ways, I don't think being a political opportunist is the worst quality to have in a candidate, which sounds bad, perhaps, but it means that they're willing to listen to people or at least appear to, because they know they rely on votes. And even some of the things that she said about public vs private positions (controversial) actually made perfect sense to me. I get that, after watching this whole debacle...we don't know how to have nuanced public conversations, so maybe it helps to be a little more Slytherin at times. No candidate is perfect, and I try to think of things that I dislike and disagree on as well as agree on, try to check myself for bias, but for me, this really was no contest.
I loved the DNC speech, and teared up a few times. I was proud of her debate performance--all the times she just reacted so calmly and smoothly...I can't imagine the fortitude it took to keep one's cool. And it wasn't just a political loss I felt or absolute terror for our country's future in the last hours of Nov 8th. It was absolute heartbreak. How did messages of "Love trumps hate" and "Better together" get beat out by sentiments of building a wall, and xenophobic comments? I try to understand things, and on some level, I do, because politics and the media and the economy and everything. But on another level, it destroys me. And it destroys me to think of the utter painshe must feel as a person...as the meme keeps saying: probably the most qualified woman in the country loses to the brash, obnoxious man. That is a real thing that I've seen so many times, that I've experienced a few times personally, but that I've seen happen far more often to so many wonderful women that I know. And it hurts. And is exhausting.
I love now though that she's out walking in the woods. That she's spared some of the utter shitstorm she would've been facing that she's won (though I still hate that she lost more than anything ever.) I loved her recent public speeches, and the way she encouraged people to keep fighting. And I believe in that. So. deeply.
So what I did, the day after the election, was...I went and bought her Funko!Pop that I originally didn't intend to buy [because I normally focus on sets from shows I really really love.] And I keep her on my shelf next to the John Oliver!Pop, and I bought it specifically after watching her concession speech. Because now, more than ever, I can't give up. So I see her Pop and it's a reminder to keep fighting harder than ever.
(Yup, cluttery bc I'm re-organizing. Why yes I do have a kickass statue of Alan Rickman as Severus Snape) |
![]() |
Source: https://i.redd.it/dyrs6yxep0fx.png |
I'm finding organizations that are doing the work that we so desperately need, and making a list, so that I can donate to them on a rotating basis over the next few years. I'm trying to reach out to people. And every time I see that Pop on my shelf, it's silly, but I'm thinking of that. It's functioning as a sort of plastic icon (I've got to blog about those later) for me, a reminder to not quit.
I'm doing it for the good of my country, for my beloved friends--especially those in vulnerable positions right now. But you know what, I'm doing it for her too. Because I feel as though in some ways, we didn't realize what we had (in Obama or in her). We have this expectation sometimes for politicians to be perfect, super-humans...and I don't think that's realistic. It's some way that I'm still with her and the values that she espoused in her DNC speech and in her slogans. The values that I do believe are a part of our country, even if none of us express or believe in or act on them perfectly. We aim towards them anyways.
+Athena
PS--God, I'm sorry this was so long, but I think I needed to get it out. I also have plans to write her a letter if I can find where I should address it.
PPS--Cary Elwes, aka Westley from Princess Bride used "Tr*mperdink" in a tweet, and I'm still laughing about it. I know that it's immature on some level, but I do think he's so far outside of the realm of a 'normal' candidate that it feels right to acknowledge that somehow. I'm going to have a hard time over the next few years.